Kawasaki KRX Forum banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Registered
2020 KRX
Joined
·
337 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I'm torn between these two. I primarily ride Moab so that will be the main goal on this set of tires. Any feedback on either of these would be great. I'm going to get the 35's so at least that decision is settled. Thanks
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
330 Posts
I run 33” 320s on my X3. They are a good lightweight high speed tire. I would compare them to BFGs. That said they are a narrow tire and dont have quite the straightline traction my MRTs had in the rocks. For the rocks of Moab and overall slower speed riding I would go with the 350s over the 320s
 

·
Super Moderator
2020 Kawasaki KRX
Joined
·
2,628 Posts
I kind of like the more rounded profile of the 320 over the flat, square profile of the 350. It handles better and tracks straighter on uneven ground. As for Moab, (and here in the Colorado Rockies) my BFG KM3's were flawless out there. They too are a little more narrow than a typical 10" tire. The contact patch is about 9" but never did that affect the grip or traction on the slick rock. If I had to replace them with a different tire, I would put on a set of 33" 320's.
I'm sure either tire would work just fine for you.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
330 Posts
I kind of like the more rounded profile of the 320 over the flat, square profile of the 350. It handles better and tracks straighter on uneven ground. As for Moab, (and here in the Colorado Rockies) my BFG KM3's were flawless out there. They too are a little more narrow than a typical 10" tire. The contact patch is about 9" but never did that affect the grip or traction on the slick rock. If I had to replace them with a different tire, I would put on a set of 33" 320's.
I'm sure either tire would work just fine for you.
The rounded profile of the 320 does handle better at high speed but in the rocks those sidewalls become a liability are very exposed. I much prefer a wider tire with larger lugs in the rocks. My MRTs are on another level in the rocks compared to the 320s.
 

·
Super Moderator
2020 Kawasaki KRX
Joined
·
2,628 Posts
The rounded profile of the 320 does handle better at high speed but in the rocks those sidewalls become a liability are very exposed. I much prefer a wider tire with larger lugs in the rocks. My MRTs are on another level in the rocks compared to the 320s.
10-4. To each their own. That's the beauty of having so many tires to choose from. 90% or more of my riding is rocks and the sidewalls are not a concern to me. I prefer the tighter tread pattern and/or a steel belted radial for protection in the rocks. I have seen more than a couple of punctures between widely spaced lugs from taking hits on jagged rocks with lighter weight tires. A steel belted radial is "nearly" bullet proof, but it also weighs a couple more pounds than most tires of the same size.
I guess any tire is better than no tire..... LOL
1196
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
325 Posts
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top