Kawasaki KRX Forum banner
141 - 146 of 146 Posts
Im pretty much convinced that you are a total moron. Every time a proven fact has been provided in this thread you go off making fun of said person and can't post anything of substance. Great job outing yourself on the internet. Im also sorry to hear that your wife and/or your finances dont allow you to do as much cool shit as I do. 😁

Here are some FACTS you should try and wrap your tiny brain around.....

-Mav R makes 240hp at the crank, 211 at the wheels with a DCT

-KRX makes 112hp at the crank, 80 at the wheels with a CVT

Please calculate for the class the percentage loss of each system and then explain to us how the new H2 with a CVT is going to be the powerhouse you seem to think its going to be. Don't worry, I'll check in later to see what retarded shit you spew instead of answering the question like people with tiny brains and no critical thinking skills do. 😘

If my math is correct, a stock KRX loses about 28% HP from the crank to there wheels.

Which is correct because most STOCK CVT belt driven OHVs lose about 25-30% HP from crank HP to rear wheel HP.

While a stock vehicle with a transmission loses a lot less HP, about 10-15%.

The Can Am Mav R loses about 12% HP between the crank and rear wheels.

So a stock CVT OHV with 246 crank HP will have 25-30% loss depending on how it's set up.


28% of 246 crank HP is 178 rear wheel HP. ;)


25% of 246 crank HP is 185 rear wheel HP.

I expect Kawasaki is trying for 180 RWHP or a little more.

But time will tell. ;P
 
141 - 146 of 146 Posts